Mr. Obama: are you eligible to be President?



“Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the Constitution’s eligibility requirements. All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility, they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.”



Democrat: Obama’s grandma confirms Kenyan birth?


8 Responses to Mr. Obama: are you eligible to be President?

  1. BL says:

    Give it up already moron.

    The REPUBLICAN Governor of Hawaii has already verified he was born in Hawaii.

  2. Allan Erickson says:


    You need to study up. Obviously the state officials in Hawaii have not addressed all the issues, and the issue does not center on the Hawaiian certification exclusively.

  3. Truga says:

    I too have been skeptical about the short form birth certificate provided by the Hawaii Dept of Health and not the long, original form of his birth certificate. Well, I happen to have a copy of my original long form birth certificate from Michigan. I just received a new birth certificate and it’s the short form that is similar to the one that Obama has provided. I don’t see any difference between my short form and Obama’s short form (there are pictures available on the internet by doing a google search).

    So I think that this is a dead issue and Obama’s short form birth certificate will not invalidate the election results. Good try…I voted for McCain.

  4. Primus Tomlinson says:

    He was birthed by an American Citizen. That makes him American citizen as long as one of the parents lived in the US prior to the child’s birth. Look up jus sanguinis if you have any questions. Personally, I honor you child’s military service, but I think you need to grow up.
    Hillary ran the gamut on Obama during the primaries and that is why none of this right-wing hackery passed mustard during the general. I don’t see what it is you are attempting to do here. McCain lost and you need to get over it. Your allegiance to W’s policies, and their inherent dishonesty, should make you question your objectivity.
    Find a more useful topic, this one, has been done to death.

  5. Allan Erickson says:

    News is news. Court actions pending. People can read whatever motives they wish. Serious people have serious questions which remain unanswered. If the Constitution means anything, the questions have to be answered, otherwise the rule of law flies out the window. At that point, what compells anyone to obey the law if the highest officials in the land ignore it. Those who simply want to sweep the matter under the rug remain unaware of the implications. Ignoring all the dimensions of this controversy for partisan reasons is certainly dishonest, immature and thoroughly subjective. If McCain had been elected and the opposition raised a similar question, the howl would be endless, just as it was in 2000, and 2004, until this very day concerning the legitimacy of those elections. In those instances there was far less evidence and fewer reasons to forward a claim than we see here, yet the Left insists everyone shut up and go home, and the media ignores the subject. If we have become a society dominated by the passions of the day rather than organized around the rule of law, we are toast anyway. Why is it people don’t get that?

  6. Allan Erickson says:


    Hackery is not a word, at least not as used in context.
    Passing mustard is what you do at a picnic.
    Obama has not passed muster, that’s why people are suing left, and right.
    Democrats were and are the driving force behind the original suits.
    Independents too.
    Your assumption of a vast rightwing conspiracy contradicts the facts.
    But we understand facts are inconvenient to ideologues.

  7. Ted says:

    “Dirty Pool” at the Supreme Court apparently on behalf of Obama currently usurping YOUR Constitution: Leo Donofrio’s companion case, brought by Cort Wrotnowski, with fuller/better briefing showing Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen” reportedly has been sidetracked to the anthrax lab to deprive the full Court from seeing those filings in connection with Donofrio’s case this Friday, Dec 5, 2008. DO SOMETHING AMERICA!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: