BHO citizenship SCOTUS latest

Justices Won’t Review Obama’s Eligibility to Serve

New Media Journal coverage

The Supreme Court has turned down another challenge to Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as president because of his citizenship. The appeal by Cort Wrotnowski of Greenwich, Conn., was denied Monday without comment. Wrotnowski argued that Obama was a British subject at birth and therefore cannot meet the requirement for becoming president. He wanted the high court to halt presidential electors from meeting to formally elect Obama as president. Echoing an appeal that was rejected by justices last week, Wrotnowski said that since Obama had dual nationality at birth – his mother was American, his Kenyan father was a British subject – he cannot possibly be a “natural born citizen.” At least two other appeals over Obama’s citizenship remain at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and Hawaii officials have confirmed.  

APNews.myway Read More

New Media Editor’s Note: We have now moved this subject to The Fifth Column page because of the SCOTUS’s abdication of responsibility where protecting the US Constitution is concerned.   Click here to learn what you can do.

Note:  Several other cases are pending, including the suit brought by Alan Keyes and the U.S. Justice Foundation


6 Responses to BHO citizenship SCOTUS latest

  1. Smooth Thug says:

    If all of these anti-Obama Looney Tunes could read, they would see that Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution does not define what “natural born citizen” means. So what it boils down to is a bunch of nut jobs giving their opinions as to what a “natural born citizen” is.

  2. Allan Erickson says:

    ” a bunch of nut jobs . . ” including Herb Titus, Alan Keyes, and Justices Thomas and Scalia, and about 500,000 Americans who’ve signed petitions, including the editorial staff at WND and Townhall. Yeah. A bunch of nut jobs concerned about the rule of law, the integrity of the Constitution and the future of the country. Yeah. Nut Jobs.

  3. Tim says:

    Yes. That is a pretty good list of the nutjobs trying to make an issue out of something that isn’t there.

  4. themadjewess says:

    Smooth THUG:
    What a jerk. YOU do NOT care about AMERICA. IF you did, you would be AGAINST this insane OUT OF CONTROL govt.

  5. Allan Erickson says:

    The Constitution defines America. If you violate the Constitution, you violate the essence of the country. Those who do not care about the Constitution do not care about the country. Simple logic. themadjewess is right and Tim and Smooth Thug are simply out to lunch, blindly following their supreme leader off a cliff.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: