.
BARACK OBAMA AND JOE BIDEN: BOLD-FACED LIARS
Working hard to make the USA one enormous Fannie Mae
9.28.08
By Allan Erickson
Obama does not believe he is ready to be President.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4yCwqtuv5Q&feature=related
In light of this: consider the following, please . . .
Sen. Joe Biden just told a crowd that Sen. McCain favors supporting a war in Iraq, indefinitely.
Just stop and think for a moment. Do you believe McCain favors unending war in Iraq, or anywhere else? Do you believe John McCain is the war monger Biden says he is?
McCain stood by our troops in time of war, supported our President, but also criticized him constructively leading to a miraculous turnaround in our fortunes in Iraq. What have Obama and Biden done (?): Whine, bitch, moan and complain, ignoring the truth, demoralizing our men and women in uniform, giving comfort to the enemy, and causing dissention at home. Lincoln would have them shot.
Joe Biden voted for the war in Oct. 2002. Now he runs around claiming McCain is wrong about everything? On Russert’s program in August 2002, Biden said: “I think Saddam either has to be separated from his weapons or taken out of power.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiPHhKvqfs8
Apparently Biden was right before he was wrong before he corrected himself to be right again, and then he voted against the surge, but now says it worked, but it was wrong, so now we are supposed to believe Biden is right and McCain is wrong. Biden takes flip flopping to a level even John Kerry cannot conceive.
Is anyone paying attention? Biden’s brain is like a hamster running the wire wheel: lots of energy expended, getting nowhere.
Sen. Biden, like his running mate, will say and do anything to get elected. They dropped all pretense of being honorable long ago. Voters should reject them on this basis alone.
The sum of Biden’s remarks today were to vilify McCain over and over with lies and half truths, periodically assuring us, he was “not making this up.”
Whenever a politician frequently reassures us he is not lying, it is more than likely he is indeed lying through his teeth. Such is the case with both Obama and Biden.
Biden asks McCain: “Where were you a year ago when Barack was talking about the sub-prime mortgage crisis?” Well Sen. Biden, 3.5 years ago McCain was fighting for reforms to prevent this crisis in housing and the financial markets, but the Democrats blocked reform.
And now you have the gall to blame McCain?! You are a filthy liar Sen. Biden, and so are you Sen. Obama.
McCain – Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005 (Democrats blocked reform)
1/26/2005 | Congressional Research Service
Posted: Tuesday, September 16, 2008
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2083758/posts
Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005
Bill Summary
1/26/2005
Introduced. Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005 – Amends the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 to establish: (1) in lieu of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), an independent Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Agency which shall have authority over the Federal Home Loan Bank Finance Corporation, the Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac); and (2) the Federal Housing Enterprise Board. Sets forth operating, administrative, and regulatory provisions of the Agency, including provisions respecting: (1) assessment authority; (2) authority to limit nonmission-related assets; (3) minimum and critical capital levels; (4) risk-based capital test; (5) capital classifications and undercapitalized enterprises; (6) enforcement actions and penalties; (7) golden parachutes; and (8) reporting. Amends the Federal Home Loan Bank Act to establish the Federal Home Loan Bank Finance Corporation. Transfers the functions of the Office of Finance of the Federal Home Loan Banks to such Corporation. Excludes the Federal Home Loan Banks from certain securities reporting requirements. Abolishes the Federal Housing Finance Board.
Obama and Biden try to blame Bush and McCain for our economic troubles. What a revelation to learn the Democrats are largely to blame. Bush and McCain tried numerous times to reform the system, but the Democrats prevented it! Why?
Because the Democrats were buying votes with sub-prime mortgages, they were lining their pockets and they were establishing national bases and centers of power: all on the backs of honest, hard-working Americans!
Read it!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/11/AR2008091102841.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1235575/posts
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122212948811465427.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75586
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=307149667289804
Anyone taking a look at the record will see clearly the Democrats foisted Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the country.
Anyone caring to read a few news stories will clearly understand this financial crisis was sparked by Freddie and Fannie and remains responsible for much of our economic trouble.
Anyone interested in the facts will understand the Democrats loosened the rules on those government-sponsored sub-prime lenders, and, the Democrats stood in the way of many attempts by Republicans during the past seven years to reform.
John McCain fought for reform of Freddie and Fannie. Obama was silent. Behind Obama’s silence he scooped up $126,000 in campaign contributions from Fannie and Freddie.
Read it for yourself, and then ask: Are these people—Obama and Biden—the very foxes you want back in the chicken coop?
‘Crony’ Capitalism Is Root Cause Of Fannie And Freddie Troubles
By TERRY JONES
INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Monday, September 22, 2008
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=306978378974502
“And that’s just what Fannie and Freddie were — fixed. They became a government-run, privately owned home finance monopoly. Fannie and Freddie became huge contributors to Congress, spending millions to influence votes. As we’ve noted here before, the bulk of the money went to Democrats. President Bush, reviled and criticized by Democrats, tried no fewer than 17 times, by White House count, to raise the issue of Fannie-Freddie reform. A bill cleared the Senate Banking panel in 2005, but stalled due to implacable opposition from Democrats and a critical core of GOP abettors. Rep. Barney Frank, who now runs the powerful House Financial Services Committee, helped spearhead that fight.”
Facts are inconvenient things Sen. Obama, Sen. Biden, especially when the people start to learn you have not only been lying to them, you’ve been picking their pockets all along and demonizing good people to provide cover. You are not only liars, you are thieves and scoundrels as well.
Joe Biden and Barack Obama are unfit for office, corrupt and disgraced.
Biden has done nothing other than feed at the public trough for 36 years.
His outrageous lies and horrendous misrepresentations should be confronted, but you’ll not see the massive media challenge their Leftist darling.
There’s simply too much at stake in the quest to destroy our republic, and replace it with a Euro-Socialist autocracy: Uncle Sam turned Aunt Fannie.
And Obama is the empty suit the radical Left manufactured—-their Manchurian candidate—poised now to make the entire country one enormous Fannie Mae.
Place the blame where it rightfully belongs: squarely on the shoulders of the Democrats and in particular on the shoulders of Obama, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, Schumer and the rest.
In the meantime, God help us.
PS: Biden does not believe Obama is fit to be President. He said so. Here it is! Bill Clinton does not believe Obama is ready to be President. Hillary agrees.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMYty1PgHEg&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BnLozS-TnM&feature=related
Obama’s ‘we suck’ tour continues at U.N.
September 24, 2009.
Obama’s UN Speech, Dissected here
Excerpt
by Peter Wehner, Commentary
In the latest stop on his American Apology Tour, Obama aimed his fire at America on the issue of global warming (“the days when America dragged its feet on this issue are over”) and democracy (“in the past America has too often been selective in its promotion of democracy”). And Obama, after humbly declaring at the outset of his speech that “I am well aware of the expectations that accompany my presidency around the world . . . they are also rooted in hope—the hope that real change is possible, and the hope that America will be a leader in bringing about such change,” went on to say this:
I took office at a time when many around the world had come to view America with skepticism and distrust. Part of this was due to misperceptions and misinformation about my country. Part of this was due to opposition to specific policies, and a belief that on certain critical issues, America has acted unilaterally, without regard for the interests of others. This has fed an almost reflexive anti-Americanism, which too often has served as an excuse for our collective inaction.
Where oh where to begin? How about by pointing out that America did not act unilaterally in Iraq or anywhere else during the Bush presidency. For example, and for the record, more than 35 countries gave crucial support—from the use of naval and air bases to help with intelligence and logistics to the deployment of combat units. President Bush answered the “unilateral” charge in his 2004 State of the Union address:
Some critics have said our duties in Iraq must be internationalized. This particular criticism is hard to explain to our partners in Britain, Australia, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, Italy, Spain, Poland, Denmark, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Romania, the Netherlands, Norway, El Salvador, and the 17 other countries that have committed troops to Iraq. As we debate at home, we must never ignore the vital contributions of our international partners, or dismiss their sacrifices.
Second, the United States actually did have in mind the interests of others—beginning with 25 million Iraqis—when it acted. The Iraq war, whatever you think about its wisdom and execution, was in part a war of liberation, undertaken for noble purposes: to liberate a captive people and to depose an aggressive dictator. We know about the Iraqi regime under Saddam Hussein; it was one of the most brutal and malevolent in modern history. The fact that we believed the Iraq war advanced America’s national interests doesn’t mean it was a war waged without regard for the interests of others. And for Obama to allow this misperception of America to go unchallenged—indeed, to give such a false and malicious charge legitimacy—is disturbing.
Third, in his speech the President said, “I pledge that America will always stand with those who stand up for their dignity and their rights.” Oh really? If so, then why was he so reluctant to speak out for the brave Iranians who rose up against the brutal rule of President Ahmadinejad?
Perhaps Mr. Obama will come to understand that there is a problem when the president of the United States—an “inestimable jewel,” Lincoln called her—has harsher things to say about his own country than he does about many of the worst regimes on Earth.
It is all quite disturbing, and to have to say this about an American president almost makes me sick.
Leave a Comment » | 1 | Tagged: Commentary, Obama UN speech, Peter Wehner | Permalink
Posted by Allan Erickson